Rapid review: Diagnostic accuracy of pooled Testing versus individual testing using RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 for screening and surveillance of individuals with suspected COVID-19

Background@#Pooled testing has been implemented on a limited scale, mainly for screening and surveillance in populations with a low prevalence of COVID-19 to save on limited resources. @*Objective@#To determine the diagnostic accuracy of pooled compared with individual RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in individuals suspected of COVID-19.@*Methods@#We searched websites of living CPGs on COVID-19 (Australian COVID-19, COVID NMA, CEBM Oxford), Philippine DOH HTA, databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, medRXIV/bioRXIV), and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies that used pooled testing on individuals suspected of COVID-19. When appropriate, we pooled data for sensitivity and specificity and obtained the range and median of other data, such as positive predictive value and resource savings. We did a priori subgroup analysis for pool size, presence or absence of symptoms and use case, type of specimen, cutoff for positivity, type of kit, and post hoc subgroup analysis for method of pooling and timing of processing. @*Results@#We included 21 studies: 6 diagnostic accuracy studies, and 15 clinical validation studies. Studies had varying populations, index test kit and performance characteristics, positivity rate (0.02 to 15%), and pool size (5 to 16). There was moderate pooled sensitivity, 81% (95% CI 72, 88; I2=73.6%; 6 studies, 776 pools) and high pooled specificity, 99% (95% CI, 98 to 100; I2=1.84%; 5 studies, 666 pools). Positive predictive value based on 21 studies ranged from 67% to 100%. Resource savings in the number of test kits used ranged from 49 to 89%. Identified harms of pooled testing were delayed turnaround time for positive samples and laboratory errors.@*Conclusion@#There is moderate sensitivity and high specificity with pooled testing for the screening of individuals with suspected COVID-19. We recommend further studies to validate the utility based on community prevalence and other test variables.

Detección de Chlamydia trachomatis en orina por LCR: aplicación del método de mezcla de muestras biológicas / Ligase chain reaction testing of pooled urine specimens to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility and validity of pooling urine samples for molecular diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Material and methods. Of 1,220 urine samples collected from Mexican female and male adolescents, 305 pools were composed of fourth individual samples each, based on a calculation of optimal pool size. These were processed by ligase chain reaction (LCR) for the detection of C. trachomatis. Positive and gray-zone pools were reanalyzed individually. Cost savings were calculated comparing actual costs of testing to the cost that would have been incurred testing all 1,220 samples individually. Results.Pools results were: 56 positive, 19 gray-zones and 230 negative. Following individual retesting of positive and gray-zone pools, 59 cases of C. trachomatis infection were identified (4.8% prevalence). Thus, a total of 601 LCR tests were performed, for a 50.4% savings considering only the direct cost of the test. Conclusions.Our experience shows that sample pooling is both a reliable and convenient tool for CT surveillance in our setting. It should be considered in other similar settings where limited resources constraint surveillance of STIs.

Objetivo. Evaluar la validez y conveniencia de la estrategia de la mezcla de muestras de orinas para el diagnóstico molecular de Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). Material y métodos. A partir de 1,220 muestras de orina recolectadas de jóvenes de uno y otro sexos, se conformaron 305 mezclas con cuatro alícuotas de muestras individuales, previo cálculo del tamaño óptimo de la mezcla. A continuación se determinó la presencia de ácidos nucleicos de clamidia en esas mezclas, mediante el método de reacción en cadena de la ligasa. Las mezclas positivas o en zona gris fueron reanalizadas de manera individual (cuatro pruebas adicionales). El número final de pruebas realizadas se comparó con el total de pruebas que se habrían efectuado individualmente. Resultados. Del total de mezclas analizadas, 230 resultaron negativas, 56 fueron positivas y 19 más se ubicaron en zona gris. Una vez reanalizadas de manera individual las mezclas positivas y las de zona gris, se obtuvieron 59 muestras de orina positivas a clamidia (prevalencia de 4.81%). De esta manera, el número total de pruebas efectuadas fue de 605 en contraste con las 1,220 que tendrían que haberse hecho si se hubieran procesado las muestras individualmente, es decir, que se logró un ahorro de 50.5% del costo directo del reactivo de diagnóstico. Conclusiones. La metodología aplicada mostró ser tanto confiable como conveniente en el entorno mexicano para llevar a cabo vigilancia epidemiológica de la infección por CT. Dado lo anterior, esta metodología podría ser considerada en otros entornos en los que la falta de recursos limita la vigilancia de las infecciones de transmisión sexual.